{"id":3785,"date":"2019-07-23T14:24:06","date_gmt":"2019-07-23T17:24:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/adepepe.org\/site\/?p=3785"},"modified":"2019-07-23T14:24:06","modified_gmt":"2019-07-23T17:24:06","slug":"adepepe-publica-nota-de-apoio-ao-defensor-gregory-victor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/adepepe.org\/site\/adepepe-publica-nota-de-apoio-ao-defensor-gregory-victor\/","title":{"rendered":"Adepepe publica nota de apoio ao defensor Gregory Victor"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"s4\"><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">A Associa\u00e7\u00e3o dos Defensores P\u00fablicos de Pernambuco (Adepepe) manifesta a sua preocupa\u00e7\u00e3o e consequente rep\u00fadio em rela\u00e7\u00e3o ao processo (Juizado Especial Misto de Cajazeiras\/PB, autos tombados sob o n\u00ba 0801082-73.2019.8.15.0131) movido pelo <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">Magistrado<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">Francisco Thiago da Silva Rabelo, do Estado da Para\u00edba, em face do <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">Defensor P<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">\u00fablico d<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">o Estado de<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">Pernambuco\u00a0<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">Gregory<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">\u00a0Victor Pinto de Farias.<\/span><\/span><!--more--><\/p>\n<p class=\"s4\"><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">O defensor p\u00fablico prop\u00f4s not\u00edcia de fato ao Conselho Nacional de Justi\u00e7a (autos n\u00ba 0801082-73.2019.8.15.0131) e \u00e0 Corregedoria de Justi\u00e7a do Tribunal da Para\u00edba (autos n\u00ba 0000698-89.2018.8.15.1001) em raz\u00e3o de procedimento instaurado\u00a0<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s5\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">ex<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"s5\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">officio<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">, no qual \u201cretirou\u201d a atribui\u00e7\u00e3o de <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">D<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">efensora <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">P<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">\u00fablica do Estado da Para\u00edba de atuar em pres\u00eddio e \u201cordenou\u201d \u00e0 Defensoria P\u00fablica do Estado da Para\u00edba que \u201cdesignasse\u201d outro defensor p\u00fablico. O <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">D<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">efensor <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">P<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">\u00fablico de Pernambuco noticiou o fato ao Conselho Nacional de Justi\u00e7a (CNJ), que \u00a0ordenou a apura\u00e7\u00e3o pela Corregedoria de Justi\u00e7a da Para\u00edba, a qual, em s\u00edntese, reconheceu o \u201cexcesso\u201d praticado pelo juiz, mas pugnou pelo arquivamento definitivo do feito.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"s4\"><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">A demanda proposta ante o Juizado Especial Misto de Cajazeiras pleiteia a condena\u00e7\u00e3o do defensor p\u00fablico no valor de R$35.000,00, al\u00e9m do ressarcimento de R$3.000,00 a t\u00edtulo de honor\u00e1rios advocat\u00edcios, sob o argumento de que houvera a instaura\u00e7\u00e3o indevida de procedimento administrativo disciplinar em face do juiz.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"s4\"><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">Com efeito, a indigitada demanda mostra ares de \u201cretalia\u00e7\u00e3o\u201d \u00e0 not\u00edcia de fato levada a efeito pelo <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">D<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">efensor <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">P<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">\u00fablico, com o consequente amesquinhamento ao direito de peti\u00e7\u00e3o sufragado pelo art. 5\u00ba, XXXIV, \u201ca\u201d, da CRFB e apequena a compet\u00eancia do Conselho Nacional de Justi\u00e7a arraigada na CRFB, insculpida no art. 103-B, \u00a75\u00ba, I da CRFB, al\u00e9m violar o art. 235, \u00a72\u00ba, do CPC e o artigo 25 do Pacto Internacional sobre Direitos Civis e Pol\u00edticos.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"s4\"><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">O Estado de Direito Democr\u00e1tico n\u00e3o compraz com tentativas de viola\u00e7\u00e3o ao direito de peti\u00e7\u00e3o, notoriamente no intuito de amorda\u00e7ar quem o fez e quem possa faz\u00ea-lo, independente de qual cargo ocupe e a par da condi\u00e7\u00e3o social a que fa\u00e7a parte.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Associa\u00e7\u00e3o dos Defensores P\u00fablicos de Pernambuco (Adepepe) manifesta a sua preocupa\u00e7\u00e3o e consequente rep\u00fadio em rela\u00e7\u00e3o ao processo (Juizado Especial Misto de Cajazeiras\/PB, autos tombados sob o n\u00ba 0801082-73.2019.8.15.0131) movido pelo MagistradoFrancisco Thiago da Silva Rabelo, do Estado da Para\u00edba, em face do Defensor P\u00fablico do Estado dePernambuco\u00a0Gregory\u00a0Victor Pinto de Farias.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3785","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-noticias"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/adepepe.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3785","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/adepepe.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/adepepe.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adepepe.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adepepe.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3785"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/adepepe.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3785\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3786,"href":"https:\/\/adepepe.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3785\/revisions\/3786"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/adepepe.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3785"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adepepe.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3785"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adepepe.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}